Low D-dimer levels at diagnosis of venous thromboembolism are associated with reduced risk of recurrence: data from the TROLL registry.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent disease with a high risk of recurrence. It has been suggested that the D-dimer level at the time of VTE diagnosis can be used to identify patients at a low risk of recurrence. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the impact of D-dimer levels measured at the time of VTE diagnosis on the risk of recurrence in a large cohort of patients with a first-time VTE. METHODS: The study included 2585 patients with first symptomatic non-cancer-associated VTE from the Venous Thrombosis Registry in Østfold Hospital (TROLL) (2005-2020). All recurrent events during the follow-up were recorded, and cumulative incidences of recurrence were estimated according to D-dimer levels of ≤1900 ng/mL (≤25th percentile) and >1900 ng/mL. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 395 patients experienced a recurrent VTE. The 1- and 5-year cumulative incidences of recurrence were 2.9% (95% CI: 1.8-4.6) and 11.4% (95% CI: 8.7-14.8), respectively, in those with a D-dimer concentration of ≤1900 ng/mL and 5.0% (95% CI, 4.0-6.1) and 18.3% (95% CI: 16.2-20.6), respectively, in those with a D-dimer concentration of >1900 ng/mL, respectively. In patients with unprovoked VTE, the 5-year cumulative incidence was 14.3% (95% CI: 10.3-19.7) in the ≤1900-ng/mL category, and 20.2% (95% CI: 17.3-23.5) in the >1900-ng/mL category. CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer levels within the lowest quartile, measured at the time of VTE diagnosis, were associated with lower recurrence risk. Our findings imply that D-dimer levels measured at the time of diagnosis may be used to identify patients with VTE at a low risk of recurrent VTE.

Elevated plasma D-dimer levels are associated with risk of future incident venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: D-dimer, a global biomarker for activation of the coagulation and fibrinolysis systems, is useful in assessing individual risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. However, there is limited information on the association between D-dimer and risk of a first lifetime VTE event. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between plasma D-dimer levels and risk of future incident VTE. METHODS: A population-based nested case-control study, comprising 414 VTE patients and 843 randomly selected age- and sex-matched controls, was derived from the Tromsø Study (1994-2007). D-dimer was measured in plasma samples collected at cohort baseline (1994-95). Odds ratios (ORs) for VTE with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated according to quartile cut-offs of D-dimer levels determined in controls. RESULTS: The risk of VTE increased across quartiles of D-dimer levels (Ptrend = 0.014) in the age- and sex-adjusted model. Participants with plasma D-dimer levels in the highest quartile (≥152 ng/mL) had an OR for VTE of 1.65 (95% CI 1.14-2.40) compared with those in the lowest quartile (<94 ng/mL). The ORs were marginally attenuated after additional adjustment for body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.20) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.90-1.98). Similar results were obtained for VTE subgroups, i.e. deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and provoked/unprovoked events. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that elevated plasma D-dimer levels are associated with increased risk of incident VTE. However, the attenuation of risk estimates upon additional adjustment for BMI and CRP suggests that D-dimer partly reflects underlying conditions associated with obesity and an inflammatory state.

D-dimer as a stand-alone test to rule out deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the use of clinical decision rules, such as Wells score, in combination with D-dimer to assess the need for objective imaging to rule out deep vein thrombosis (DVT). However, the clinical decision rule has limitations, and use of D-dimer as a stand-alone test has been suggested. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the safety and efficiency of D-dimer as a stand-alone test to rule out DVT in outpatients referred with suspected DVT. METHODS: We collected data from consecutive outpatients referred to our hospital with suspected DVT in 2008-2018. D-dimer levels were analyzed using STA® Liatest® D-Di assay. D-dimer as a stand-alone test was theoretically applied in retrospect, and the number of misdiagnosed events were estimated as if such an approach had been initially used. All patients were followed for three months. RESULTS: Of 1765 included patients, 293 (16.6%) were diagnosed with DVT. A total of 491 patients (27.8%) had a negative D-dimer (<500 ng/mL). Of these, nine were diagnosed with DVT, yielding a failure rate for D-dimer as a stand-alone test of 1.8% (95% CI 0.8%-3.5%). The majority of the misdiagnosed patients had distal DVT. In analyses restricted to proximal DVTs, the failure rate was 0.6% (95% CI 0.1%-1.8%). D-dimer as a stand-alone approach reduced the proportion of required ultrasounds from 81.8% to 72.2%. CONCLUSION: D-dimer as a stand-alone test may be safe for excluding proximal DVT and reduce the proportion of required ultrasounds. Prospective management studies are needed to confirm our findings.